Search for: All records

Data center downtime typically centers around IT equipment failure. Storage devices are the most frequently failing components in data centers. We present a comparative study of hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid state drives (SSDs) that constitute the typical storage in data centers. Using six-year field data of 100,000 HDDs of different models from the same manufacturer from the Backblaze dataset and six-year field data of 30,000 SSDs of three models from a Google data center, we characterize the workload conditions that lead to failures. We illustrate that their root failure causes differ from common expectations and that they remain difficult to discern. For the case of HDDs we observe that young and old drives do not present many differences in their failures. Instead, failures may be distinguished by discriminating drives based on the time spent for head positioning. For SSDs, we observe high levels of infant mortality and characterize the differences between infant and non-infant failures. We develop several machine learning failure prediction models that are shown to be surprisingly accurate, achieving high recall and low false positive rates. These models are used beyond simple prediction as they aid us to untangle the complex interaction of workload characteristics that lead to failures and identify failure root causes from monitored symptoms. 

We present an individual-centric agent-based model and a flexible tool, GeoSpread, for studying and predicting the spread of viruses and diseases in urban settings. Using COVID-19 data collected by the Korean Center for Disease Control & Prevention (KCDC), we analyze patient and route data of infected people from January 20, 2020, to May 31, 2020, and discover how infection clusters develop as a function of time. This analysis offers a statistical characterization of population mobility and is used to parameterize GeoSpread to capture the spread of the disease. We validate simulation predictions from GeoSpread with ground truth and we evaluate different what-if counter-measure scenarios to illustrate the usefulness and flexibility of the tool for epidemic modeling. 

Serverless computing is gaining popularity for machine learning (ML) serving workload due to its autonomous resource scaling, easy to use and pay-per-use cost model. Existing serverless platforms work well for image-based ML inference, where requests are homogeneous in service demands. That said, recent advances in natural language processing could not fully benefit from existing serverless platforms as their requests are intrinsically heterogeneous. Batching requests for processing can significantly increase ML serving efficiency while reducing monetary cost, thanks to the pay-per-use pricing model adopted by serverless platforms. Yet, batching heterogeneous ML requests leads to additional computation overhead as small requests need to be "padded" to the same size as large requests within the same batch. Reaching effective batching decisions (i.e., which requests should be batched together and why) is non-trivial: the padding overhead coupled with the serverless auto-scaling forms a complex optimization problem. To address this, we develop Multi-Buffer Serving (MBS), a framework that optimizes the batching of heterogeneous ML inference serving requests to minimize their monetary cost while meeting their service level objectives (SLOs). The core of MBS is a performance and cost estimator driven by analytical models supercharged by a Bayesian optimizer. MBS is prototyped and evaluated on AWS using bursty workloads. Experimental results show that MBS preserves SLOs while outperforming the state-of-the-art by up to 8 x in terms of cost savings while minimizing the padding overhead by up to 37 x with 3 x less number of serverless function invocations. 

As Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are becoming a de facto solution for accelerating a wide range of applications, their reliable operation is becoming increasingly important. One of the major challenges in the domain of GPU reliability is to accurately measure GPGPU application error resilience. This challenge stems from the fact that a typical GPGPU application spawns a huge number of threads and then utilizes a large amount of potentially unreliable compute and memory resources available on the GPUs. As the number of possible fault locations can be in the billions, evaluating every fault and examining its effect on theapplication error resilience is impractical. Application resilience is evaluated via extensive fault injection campaigns based on sampling of an extensive fault site space. Typically, the larger the input of the GPGPU application, the longer the experimental campaign. In this work, we devise a methodology, SUGAR (Speeding Up GPGPU Application Resilience Estimation with input sizing), that dramatically speeds up the evaluation of GPGPU application error resilience by judicious input sizing. We show how analyzing a small fraction of the input is sufficient to estimate the application resilience with high accuracy and dramatically reduce the duration of experimentation. Key of our estimation methodology is the discovery of repeating patterns as a function of the input size. Using the well-established fact that error resilience in GPGPU applications is mostly determined by the dynamic instruction count at the thread level, we identify the patterns that allow us to accurately predict application error resilience for arbitrarily large inputs. For the cases that we examine in this paper, this new resilience estimation mechanism provides significant speedups (up to 1336 times) and 97.0 on the average, while keeping estimation errors to less than 1%. 

Nearly all principal cloud providers now provide burstable instances in their offerings. The main attraction of this type of instance is that it can boost its performance for a limited time to cope with workload variations. Although burstable instances are widely adopted, it is not clear how to efficiently manage them to avoid waste of resources. In this paper, we use predictive data analytics to optimize the management of burstable instances. We design CEDULE+, a data-driven framework that enables efficient resource management for burstable cloud instances by analyzing the system workload and latency data. CEDULE+ selects the most profitable instance type to process incoming requests and controls CPU, I/O, and network usage to minimize the resource waste without violating Service Level Objectives (SLOs). CEDULE+ uses lightweight profiling and quantile regression to build a data-driven prediction model that estimates system performance for all combinations of instance type, resource type, and system workload. CEDULE+ is evaluated on Amazon EC2, and its efficiency and high accuracy are assessed through real-case scenarios. CEDULE+ predicts application latency with errors less than 10%, extends the maximum performance period of a burstable instance up to 2.4 times, and decreases deployment costs by more than 50%.